Posts Tagged ‘Bill’

Bill introduced in North Carolina House to limit malt beverage sales

Saturday, April 20th, 2013

Lawmakers in Raleigh, North Carolina have introduced a new bill to limit where certain flavored malt beverages may be sold in the state. The proposed measure applies flavored beverages that contain nine to 15 percent alcohol content. The idea is aimed at curbing underage drinking in the state.

The lawmakers believe that the flavored malt beverages, such as Four Loko, Loose and Blast taste too much like soda pop and therefore appeal to people who are under the age of 21–the legal age to possess or drink alcohol in North Carolina. Lawmakers wish to limit the availability of such flavored malt beverages. The bill would make it illegal to sell the beverages anywhere but in North Carolina Alcohol Beverage Control stores.

A spokesperson for the North Carolina Alcohol Policy Alliance says that, “Existing flavored alcohol beverages are more popular than beer among teenage girls and represent over 16 percent of the youth alcohol market,” according to WNCN News.

A community advocate who founded Together For Resilient Youth in North Carolina says that limiting sales of the flavored malt beverages to ABC stores will move the sales to a controlled environment. She says that the number one place teens obtain alcohol is through friends or from home. But she says that the number two source of alcohol for underage drinkers is convenience or grocery stores. The bill aims to eliminate non-ABC locations as a potential source for the flavored malt beverages.

The measure passed its first reading in the House last week and was sent to the House Committee on Rules, Calendar and Operations.

North Carolina law has many provisions aimed at controlling underage drinking. People under the age of 21 can face criminal charges for allegedly possessing or consuming alcohol. Similarly, people of any age can face charges for providing alcohol to a minor.

Source: WNCT, “Bill aims to curb underage drinking by limiting malt beverage access,” WNCN Staff, April 12, 2013

Greenville DUI Attorney Blog | North Carolina Underage Drinking Lawyer | Pitt County First DUI Law Firm

Washington bill will allow tasting in classes for teens

Wednesday, March 20th, 2013

Washington senators are advancing a proposal that would allow older teenagers to taste alcohol in culinary, beer technology, or similar community college classes. If passed, the bill will enable 18-20 year olds to better understand their course work by responsibly (and under supervision) tasting (though they are not supposed to consume) alcohol.

Though the bill’s intent is to enhance the educational experience of these students and better prepare them for their careers, it has the potential to indirectly promote responsibility by removing the mystique surrounding alcohol for under age drinkers.

Choose Responsibility Blog

North Carolina bill seeks to modify habitual DWI offense

Sunday, February 17th, 2013

Earlier this month, this blog discussed habitual driving while impaired charges. North Carolina law allows authorities to seek felony DWI charges against drivers with repeat DWI offenses within a 10 year time frame. A fourth conviction of DWI within 10 years qualifies as a habitual DWI offense, which carries the potential for serious consequences, starting with a mandatory minimum prison sentence.

Lawmakers are considering a change to North Carolina law to allow prosecutors to pursue more felony DWIs under the habitual DWI provisions of the law. A bill has been introduced in the House that would somewhat modify the 10-year look-back period. The House bill proposes to eliminate the 10-year period for people who have been previously convicted of a habitual DWI offense.

In other words, a fourth offense within 10 years would still qualify for a habitual DWI charge, but a driver previously convicted of the felony level DWI would qualify for new habitual DWI charges in North Carolina regardless of the timing of the previous habitual conviction.

Authorities do not know how many people have avoided habitual DWI charges due to the current version of the look-back period. Twenty two sponsors have signed on to the measure, known as House Bill 31.

The measure reportedly was prompted after a 53-year-old habitual DWI offender was released on parole in 2010. He had been sentenced in 1993 to a 40-year prison term. He had spent 17 years behind bars before his parole. Authorities say that he was convicted of DWI in Guilford County in 2011 and has more recently been charged in Forsythe County. Neither of the recent offenses qualified as habitual DWI offenses because the most recent prior occurred before the 17 years the man spent in prison.

Source: News-Record, “DWI bill would remove N.C. loophole,” Travis Fain, Feb. 14, 2013

Greenville DUI Attorney Blog | North Carolina Underage Drinking Lawyer | Pitt County First DUI Law Firm

Why did the GOP block the campaign bill?

Wednesday, March 21st, 2012

As expected, Senate GOP blocks campaign bill

By DAVID ESPO (AP) – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans blocked legislation imposing new restrictions on political activity by special interest groups Tuesday, likely dealing a fatal blow to a drive by the White House and congressional Democrats to rewrite campaign rules in the run-up to the midterm elections.

The 57-41 vote was three short of the total needed to advance the measure, which calls for greater disclosure on campaign advertising funded independently by corporations, unions and other organizations, but included an exemption for the National Rifle Association and a small number of other groups.

Less than 100 days before the elections, the debate was highly political — and the outcome widely anticipated.

Anticipating defeat, Democrats swiftly unleashed a coordinated attack employing one of their emerging campaign themes. "After a year of defending big banks, big insurance, big oil and other special interests, Republicans might want to drown out the voices of Americans who don’t have the financial resources of big corporations but want to have their say in this year’s elections," the party’s chairman, Tim Kaine, said in a statement.

Republicans, anticipating big gains in the fall, folded the day’s Senate events into their own election-year argument — that Democrats have been unsuccessful in easing double-digit unemployment.

"Today was a rebuke to congressional Democrats who need to put aside their electoral self-interest and start addressing our struggling economy, which continues to be the primary concern among American voters," GOP Chairman Michael Steele said.

Democrats drafted the bill in response to a Supreme Court ruling last winter that said corporations and unions were free to spend their own money on advertising, mass mailings and other forms of political activity. A companion measure cleared the House last month on a near party-line vote over vociferous Republican protests.

Under both bills, nearly all organizations airing political ads independently of candidates or the political parties would be required to disclose their top donors and the amounts they paid. The group’s CEO or other top official would be required to appear on screen taking responsibility for the commercial.

Additionally, any business, union or other entity holding a government contract worth more than million would be banned from a variety of political activity, as would firms in possession of federal bailout funds and corporations in which foreigners own more than a majority of voting shares.

Corporations, labor unions and others engaging in certain types of independent political activity would be required to report donations, dues or other contributions from all donors who have given 0 or more.

Whatever the partisanship involved, the legislation was a case study in the power of special interests.

The NRA exemption originally was added in the House after Democrats concluded it was essential if moderate and conservative members of the rank and file were to vote for the legislation. The loophole was then broadened as the leadership sought to quell criticism that it was bowing to a group that had been instrumental in blocking gun control bills long sought by liberals.

In the end, the NRA was officially neutral, angering Republicans who didn’t want Democrats to have any political help in advancing the legislation.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO both opposed the bill, a rare agreement of two arch-foes. Organized labor had been neutral when the bill passed the House, but switched its position after changes were made to tighten reporting requirements for transfers of dues money from local unions and their national headquarters.

The American Civil Liberties Union also was against the bill, arguing it was a violation of First Amendment rights.

The constitutional debate was overshadowed by the approach of elections, though.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the bill’s chief sponsor, said it was intended to crack down on shadowy campaign groups that spend heavily on attack ads. Referring to Republicans, he said, "There are visions, visions in people’s heads of Karl Rove spending million funded by people we don’t know to attack candidates for reasons we’re not sure of and never putting their name to it."

Republicans were unpersuaded.

"This bill is a partisan effort, pure and simple, drafted behind closed doors by current and former Democrat campaign committee leaders," said Sen. Mitch McConnell, the GOP Senate leader. "And it’s aimed at one thing and one thing only: this bill is about protecting incumbent Democrats from criticism ahead of November."

Schumer was chairman of the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which is responsible for maximizing the party’s chances in Senate races, before stepping asi

They finally got their way after DECADES with the Citizens United case.

Now their corporate overlords can dump unlimited amounts of funding into campaigning so long is not directly given to a candidate (and they have PACs for that)…. so now that big business can throw their weight around….

….Why would the party of "big business" want campaign finance reform at this point?

It took decades to get that many conservatives on the SCOTUS to issue such an extraordinary ACTIVIST decision…. they don’t want to give away the advantage in the very first year…. no matter how bad that makes them look.

Socky: Read the story. The NRA exemption was to coax some conservatives (often heavily funded by NRA) to vote for this law without ham-stringing their campaign finances. Even with that GIANT bone before them….. Conservatives chose to side with big-money interests rather than CITIZENS. That’s all.

Political Campaign Advertising

Proposed Bill Would Allow Eighteen-Year Olds to Drink in Bars

Monday, February 6th, 2012

A bill proposed by Minnesota state representative Phyllis Khan (DFL-Minneapolis) would enable 18-year-olds to consume alcohol in bars and restaurants but not purchase liquor in stores. Kahn speaks of her motive for proposing this bill:

I’m totally appalled by people going out on their 21st birthday and getting totally smashed.

Khan also argues that the 21-year-old drinking age has led to higher rates of binge drinking. Read the full article on Khan’s bill and reactions from college students here.

Choose Responsibility Blog

Virginia Governor McDonnell signs tough underage drunk driving bill

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011
July 1, 2011

Yesterday we visited Richmond, VA with our partner, the Washington Regional Alcohol Program (WRAP) for the ceremonial bill-signing with Governor Bob McDonnell for Virginia House Bill 1407, sponsored by Delegate Janis and Senate Bill 770, sponsored by Senator Marsden.

Governor McDonnell (seated) with Senator Marsden (left) and Delegate Janis (Right.)

The Century Council is a proud supporter of the new zero tolerance law for underage drinking and driving in Virginia. Effective today, minors convicted of driving after consuming virtually any amount of alcohol will lose their driver’s licenses for a year and be guilty of a Class 1 Misdemeanor.

Senator Marsden described the bill by saying, “If a police officer sees someone in a car with a six-pack of beer in their lap and that person turns out to be under 21, well they are guilty of committing a Class 1 Misdemeanor. But if that same person decides to drink those beers, pull out into traffic, get pulled over and be somewhere between a .02 and a .06 (BAC) – they are guilty of a Class 2 Misdemeanor, and that makes no sense. That’s what this bill tries to fix.”

Delegate Janis spoke about today being a culmination of a nearly four-year effort resulting in the passage of this legislation that sends a clear and unequivocal message. “If you should exercise poor judgment and make a bad decision to drink alcohol in Virginia underage, and if you further complicate that decision by getting behind the wheel of an automobile…you’re going to be walking for 12 months,” said Janis.

Century Council Blog

Alabama Passes Interlock Bill

Wednesday, June 8th, 2011
June 6, 2011

The Century Council is happy to announce that the Alabama State Legislature has passed HB 361, the Matthew John Dahl DUI Prevention Act, requiring interlocks for high BAC and repeat DUI offenders. If enacted, this legislation will make Alabama the 50th and final state to implement some type of ignition interlock law.

In Alabama, 66% of the alcohol-impaired driving fatalities involved a driver with a BAC of .15 or higher according to 2009 fatal crash data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

HB 361 would require interlocks for all repeat DUI offenders plus those convicted of a first offense involving a BAC of .15 or higher, BAC test refusal, a child passenger, or injury to someone besides the offender.

The Century Council worked hard to support this bill along with Smart Start, MADD, Chiefs of Police, Sheriffs, the Department of Public Safety and legislative leadership. We urge Governor Bentley to sign HB 361 this week.

Century Council Blog

Rep. Kingston: Military Leaders Support Drinking Age Bill

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

Gordon Jackson of the Florida Times-Union reports that military leaders support for Rep. Jack Kingston’s bill to lower the drinking age to 18 for enlisted service men and women consuming beer and wine in on-premise drinking establishments:

“Proposed legislation to allow service members under 21 to drink beer and wine at base restaurants and clubs has strong support among military leaders, U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., said Friday.

But the military brass are hesitant to publicly express their opinion, said Kingston, who has introduced the bill that would lower the drinking age to 18 at domestic and foreign bases.

‘Unofficially, they agree with us,’ Kingston said. ‘Officially, they are reluctant to speak out.’”

Shelia McNeill, former president of the Navy League, also supported the bill, telling Jackson that enlisted men and women “should not have to sneak around” to drink.

Check out the rest of the story in the Times-Union and let us know what you think in the comments.

Choose Responsibility Blog