Posts Tagged ‘allow’

Washington bill will allow tasting in classes for teens

Wednesday, March 20th, 2013

Washington senators are advancing a proposal that would allow older teenagers to taste alcohol in culinary, beer technology, or similar community college classes. If passed, the bill will enable 18-20 year olds to better understand their course work by responsibly (and under supervision) tasting (though they are not supposed to consume) alcohol.

Though the bill’s intent is to enhance the educational experience of these students and better prepare them for their careers, it has the potential to indirectly promote responsibility by removing the mystique surrounding alcohol for under age drinkers.

Choose Responsibility Blog

New photo radar regulations allow trailer-mounted vehicles

Thursday, December 27th, 2012

New photo radar regulations will make it even easier for police to ticket unsuspecting motorists, says a traffic enforcement watchdog.

Manitoba stories

Proposed Bill Would Allow Eighteen-Year Olds to Drink in Bars

Monday, February 6th, 2012

A bill proposed by Minnesota state representative Phyllis Khan (DFL-Minneapolis) would enable 18-year-olds to consume alcohol in bars and restaurants but not purchase liquor in stores. Kahn speaks of her motive for proposing this bill:

I’m totally appalled by people going out on their 21st birthday and getting totally smashed.

Khan also argues that the 21-year-old drinking age has led to higher rates of binge drinking. Read the full article on Khan’s bill and reactions from college students here.

Choose Responsibility Blog

Do you think its fair in DC mayor says ignore any crimes committed by illegals how can he allow amnesty of?

Tuesday, October 25th, 2011

Do you think its fair in DC mayor says ignore any crimes committed by illegals how can he allow amnesty for all illegals and state that U.S. laws in no way apply to them ? The post 9-11 world dictates that there are very public few places in Washington, D.C. where lawfully abiding residents and commuters are not discretely monitored, politely questioned, or upon entering buildings, physically searched. But while we accept scrutiny in order to enhance public safety, illegal aliens – those who have broken U.S. laws and whose unknown motives may deserve the most scrutiny – enjoy the least, thanks to a longstanding sanctuary policy reinforced this week.

Letting the powerful illegal alien lobbies know that he’s looking out for their best interests, Washington, D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray has signed an executive order formalizing the existing “don’t-ask-don’t-tell” policy which prohibits police from inquiring about the immigration status of people they arrest or reporting that status to federal authorities.

The mayor claims that D.C. police are not in the business of enforcing federal immigration laws. Does that mean his officers won’t pursue bank robbers or kidnappers if they come in contact with perpetrators of crimes typically handled by federal agencies?

If any city in America has a history of working closely with their federal partners, it’s Washington, D.C. The sanctuary policy is not about jurisdiction, it’s about defying immigration enforcement with great fanfare to whip up political support with a growing Hispanic community.

Police are authorized and have a responsibility to enforce all laws, unless of course they’re specifically told by their local jurisdiction not to. Asking about immigration status after lawful conduct and reasonable suspicion doesn’t transform any police officer into an ICE agent, it simply allows that officer to conduct a basic precept of law enforcement – don’t catch and release lawbreakers and jeopardize public safety.

Tonight somewhere in Washington, D.C., an officer will probably encounter a speeding vehicle and begin a lawful traffic stop asking for license, registration and proof of insurance – a universal verification process that is the same for everyone. And that vehicle might be loaded with 9 people who speak no English, have no driver’s licenses, no vehicle registration, no auto insurance, no social security numbers and maybe only Mexican consular cards or Gold’s Gym Cards. At that point common sense might suggest that asking about immigration status is warranted. But Mayor Gray thinks that D.C. residents will be better off if the officer ignores the obvious and just says “have a nice day” or preferably, ’que tenga un buen días.”

And the residents of Washington, D.C. – sharing their space already with 35,000 illegal aliens – won’t be having a nice day. Sanctuary city policies not only let the existing illegal aliens know they have no worries, but are also welcome mats to thousands more. Mayor Gray’s job is to allocate limited community resources to legal residents, not advertise his city as a safe haven and encourage thousands of additional illegal aliens to come in and drain finite services.

http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/news/national/foxnews/DC-to-Illegal-Immigrants-Dont-Ask-Dont-Tell-Dont-Worry_27368851

So if somebody illegal robs a bank, the police cannot do anything but say, have a nice day ?

This one, admittedly, makes no sense at all. I heard it this morning, on Fox News, and could not believe my ears. An executive order, putting "cuffs" on the authorities, is outrageous.

No wonder so many American citizens are out of work – their jobs are secured by those who have been given a free license to work here, without background checks or proper identification.

We are rushing towards chaos – nationwide chaos, and the "powers-that-be" are aiding and abetting the perpetrators.


Political Campaign Advertising

Is it appropriate to allow government to regulate commercial speech such as advertising than political speech?

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010

Tell why or why not.

It is appropriate for government to regulate fraud. To the extent speech constitutes fraud, or an implied contract, it is the place of government to regulate or enforce it.


Political Campaign Advertising