millerboycott.com

Global resorts network is surely an Arizona based company that provides a small business opportunity marketing an eternity luxury travel membership this is a inexpensive option to owning a timeshare or condo or paying market rates for hotel stays. The membership allows for seven days stays at 4 and 5 star resorts around the world at vacation hotspots for bargain prices of $298 to $799 weekly.

I compared travel reservations with Expedia, Travelocity and Hotels.com and it’s also not uncommon for Global Resorts booking at to operate between $1,500 and $2,300 at these other travel sites. The $298 8 day/7 night stay is an element of the Hot Weeks specials and includes paradise destinations like Hawaii, Barbados, the Bahamas, trinidad and Greece. I made sure to utilize the identical travel dates in each comparison.

Global Resorts pays a $1,000 for the representative who makes the $2,095 sale for your lifetime travel membership. Exactly the same package has existed for more than 20 years and it has sold at as up to $10,000. If you’re considering joining the Global resorts network program being an affiliate, think about the person you join with like a tour guide. Find someone who is actively training their teammates to ensure your adventure with GRN can be a profitable journey.

The membership features a wide choice of 4 and 5 star luxury resorts and vacation rentals to choose from, and the value can there be but to generate money you need to have good marketing set up. There are other travel opportunities like MOR Vacations which looks similar. Personally the fact the worldwide Resorts membership has existed for so long makes me feel well informed in regards to the long term stay.

Most fail at an web business because they can’t put the puzzle together.

Accomplishment in any Multilevel marketing necessitates creating a profitable plan.
Check out more Gloabl Resorts Network Reviews.

It is an unfortunate fact that law and politics repeatedly trump science when it comes to prosecuting citizens accused of drunk driving…

In People v. Bransford, to cite one notable example, the California Supreme Court was confronted with a defendant who was challenging his conviction for driving with over .08% blood in his blood on the grounds that he was not permitted to offer scientific evidence to the jury. Specifically, he was not permitted to offer the testimony of recognized experts that the breath machine’s computer was programmed to assume that there were 2100 parts of alcohol in his blood for every 1 part it measured in his breath.

He was also prevented by the trial judge from offering further evidence from expert witnesses that this 2100:1 ratio was only an average – and that the actual ratio varied widely from person to person, and within one person from moment to moment. If, for example, a suspect’s ratio had been 1300:1 at the time he blew a .10% on the machine, his true blood-alcohol would have actually been .06% — that is, he would have been convicted…but innocent.

The Supreme Court of California affirmed the conviction, however, ruling that such scientific facts are irrelevant: the law was written in a way that concerned the amount of alcohol in the blood ”as measured on the breath”. In a display of either twisted logic or ignorance of the scientific facts involved, the Court simply said that the crime consisted of the amount of alcohol in the blood– but only as measured on the breath. In other words, although the crime is having .08% alcohol in the blood, you can’t offer evidence that this doesn’t accurately reflect the amount of alcohol actually in the blood!

An amazing decision.

More interesting, perhaps, is the language in the Court’s opinion — an opinion which gives us a window into the justices’ minds. In what must have been a complete failure to appreciate the significance of what they were writing, the Court justified its ruling in a rather frank — and incredible — admission of its hidden agenda:

"It will increase the likelihood of convicting such a driver, because the prosecution need not prove actual impairment…Adjudication of such criminal charges will also require fewer legal resources, because fewer legal issues will arise. And individuals prosecuted under such a statute will be less likely to contest the charges." People v. Bransford, 8 Cal.4th 894 (1994).

In other words, preventing an accused from defending himself with scientific truth serves justice by making it easier to get convictions!

Are all judges oblivious to the truth? Not entirely. One judge, Justice Joyce Kennard, dissented from the majority opinion. Recognizing the truth, she wrote in a separate opinion:  "The majority has on its own created the new crime of driving with alcohol in one’s breath."
 

DUI BLOG

Two youth have been arrested in connection with a homicide at Pauingassi First Nation.
Manitoba stories

With Florida poised to potentially pass legislation which would allow police to charge drivers for texting behind the wheel, there is renewed interest in the issue of distracted driving. While motorists and experts agree that distracted driving is major issue leading to car collisions in Fort Lauderdale and other cities, however, there is some disagreement about how distracted driving can be defined. The media tends to focus on mobile devices and while these distractions can certainly be a danger on the roads and lead to many traffic accidents in Fort Lauderdale and other cities, most experts agree that distracted driving is a much bigger problem.

A recent study from Erie Insurance confirms this. The insurance companies reviewed data from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and concluded that one in ten traffic collisions across the country are caused by distracted driving. According to the study, the most common causes of distraction were:

•Daydreaming or loss of focus (associated with 63% of fatal distraction-related car accidents between 2010 and 2011)
•Cell phone use (12%)
•Outside distraction (7%)
•Passengers (5%)
•Drinking or eating while driving (2%)
•Adjusting car controls or devices (2%)
•Moving items inside the car (1%)
•Smoking (1%)

The problem with these types of distractions is that it is impossible to pass legislation to target these types of behaviors. It is impossible to tell, for example, if a driver is daydreaming or simply not focused on the road – even though this appears to be the biggest danger behind the wheel. While a texting ban may help prevent some truck accidents in Fort Lauderdale and other cities, there is no legal way to address all the possible types of distractions that can lead to collisions.

Instead, it is up to motorists to take the steps necessary to prevent accidents caused by distraction. According to Erie Insurance and other experts, there are a number of things that drivers can do to avoid being in (or causing) a distracted-driving collision:

•Pull over to make phone calls or use mobile devices
•Keep your mobile devices turned off while you drive
•Do not drive when you are having trouble focusing or when you are fatigued
•Provide a good role model for your children by driving responsibly
•Never drink or eat while driving – pull over and eat in your car if you go through a drive-through
•Adjust your mirrors, radio, and other controls before you start to drive
•Secure pets in a cage or kennel while driving – this makes the drive safer for you and your pets
•Keep your windows rolled up on warm days to prevent debris and insects from flying in your car
•Wear sunglasses when driving on sunny days
•Keep the interior of your car tidy

Florida Car Accident Lawyer Blog

Elijah Harper — The Man Who Said No, to many Canadians — was remembered as much more by friends and family at funeral events Monday.
Manitoba stories

A couple of days ago I commented on the just-released recommendations by the National Transportation Safety Board for a new drunk driving blood-alcohol limit of .05%.  Following are a few of the reactions….

Feds Float Lower DWI Limit; Some Say It Will Reduce Fatalities; Others Say It's a Money-Grab

Newsday, New York.  May 14 — One drink for a 120 pound woman, two drinks for a 160 pound man.

That's all it would take to be considered legally drunk under a new federal recommendation to lower the driving while intoxicated blood-alcohol limit from .08 percent to .05 percent. It's another step in what the National Transportation Safety Board calls "Reaching Zero," a long-term effort to reduce the number of drunken driving-related fatalities.

"It is an aggressive approach," said Jared Altman, a Montrose-based defense attorney. "One would be surprised at how little you can drink and hit the .08 limit now."

Reaction to the NTSB's recommendation on Tuesday ranged from full support from road safety advocacy groups to a cautious wait-and-see approach from others.

White Plains-based attorney Richard Portale said changing the definition of "intoxicated" every few years is disingenuous. He said he'd be more willing to support the law if it merely set a limit for driving and did not try to redefine intoxication, but said he believes it's ultimately a "money-grab" by the government. Several studies have found that towns and cities enjoy a boom in court fees and related fines when blood-alcohol limits are lowered.

"They're dying for money. They don't get enough of our tax money, so now they want to change our DWI laws to generate more revenue," Portale said…

If lawmakers act on the NTSB's recommendation and lower the legal limit for drivers, it would mark the second time in a decade that the limit was lowered. New York lowered the legal limit from .10 to .08 in 2003, two years after president Bill Clinton signed a law that would withhold federal aid to states that did not lower limits to that number…

A 2000 study by Boston University's Social and Behavioral Sciences Department found that states that had dropped BAC limits to .08 percent saw a 6 percent decline in alcohol-related deaths. But a 2002 study by Connecticut's Office of Legislative Research found there was "no statistical difference" between the rate of fatalities between states with a .10 blood alcohol limit and states with a .08 limit.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving on Tuesday thanked the NTSB "for bring the American public's attention to the fact that drinking and driving continues to be a major problem on our highways … and that additional steps have to be taken to save the unnecessary loss of life and injuries that occur as a result of these crashes."…
 

DUI BLOG

Weather and weather-related fatalities usually only make the news when they concern a serious natural disaster such as a hurricane. But there may be another reason to keep an eye on the skies: according to experts, one of the leading causes of weather-related fatalities is traffic accidents. In fact, the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) reports that over 7000 people across the country die each year in car and traffic accidents caused by inclement weather. Most of these fatalities tend to be overlooked because they are not counted among the deaths caused by serious storms and most of these fatalities involve one or two-car accidents. Experts are now paying more attention, however, hoping to reduce the number of weather-related traffic fatalities in Miramar and other communities.

According to meteorologists and other experts, there a number of things that drivers can do to help prevent weather-related car crashes in Miramar and other communities:

1) Understand what conditions to look for. Many people understand that snow, ice, and water can mean slippery conditions, but a range of weather conditions – including whiteouts, fog, sunny days, wildfire smoke – can create potentially dangerous conditions. Any situation that interferes with visibility or makes the roads slippery can cause dangerous road conditions.

2) Be prepared for different weather conditions. Even a very sunny day with glare can lead to a car or truck accident in Miramar if you aren’t prepared for it. In your car, keep the tools you need to stay safe. This may mean sunglasses and a hat for sunny weather and extra windshield wiper fluid for days where visibility is a problem and you need your windshield to be as clean as possible for the best visibility.

3) Keep your car in good condition. Good brake systems, tires, and windshields ensure that your car is prepared for various weather. Take your car in for regular tune-ups to ensure that it drives safely. Consider getting all-season tires, even if you never plan on driving outside of Florida and don’t need to worry about ice and snow. Tires with good treads can really help in any wet or slipper road conditions and could potentially help you prevent a pedestrian accident in Miramar or your community.

4) Stay alert about weather conditions. Get into the habit of checking weather conditions before hopping in your car. Don’t head out when the weather is very bad and if you do need to drive in inclement weather, be prepared to give yourself extra time to get to your destination.

In the future, there may be new ways to help prevent weather-related car and truck accidents in Miramar and across the country. The U.S. Department of Transportation is funding new technology, the “Vehicle Data Translator,” which would gather and share up-to-date atmosphere and road conditions with drivers in real time, giving motorists the information they need to stay safer on the roads. The system would collect data from cars and from local weather stations as well as other sources in order to give drivers more information to prevent collisions.

Florida Car Accident Lawyer Blog

As we move toward the Memorial Holiday weekend, law enforcement in North Carolina is working on its plans for summer enforcement of the state’s drunk driving laws. North Carolina law allows authorities to conduct checkpoints aimed at catching drivers who are allegedly driving while impaired. Often, the state may bring in what many North Carolina residents recognize as the BATMobile, a mobile unit with breath testing machines, and facilities that include the availability of an on-site magistrate to process DWI charges.

North Carolina officials say that the Highway Patrol and other agencies, including the Wildlife Resources Commission and the Division of Alcohol Law Enforcement, will be setting up DWI checkpoints near parks and water recreation areas across the state during the summer months.

Enforcement efforts will be especially focused on the three big summer holidays, Memorial Day, the Fourth of July and Labor Day. Each year, the state runs DWI enforcement campaigns during the holidays, as well as at random times throughout the year.

Later this month, state officials plan to kick-off the summer DWI enforcement season surrounding the Memorial Day weekend. The campaign, dubbed “On the Road, On the Water, Don’t Drink and Drive,” is slated for kick-off May 24. Needless to say, DWI checkpoints and saturation patrols may arise in other areas not associated with parks and recreational areas.

Troopers and other law enforcement agents plan to set up sobriety checkpoints to enforce DWI laws. However, followers of this blog may recognize that a wide variety of allegations can arise during a DWI checkpoint, ranging from a variety of alleged traffic offenses, to allegations of felony-level offenses as cars pass through a checkpoint.

Years ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled that sobriety checkpoints do not necessarily violate the constitutional guarantees prohibiting unreasonable government intrusion. However, the high court did not suggest that DWI checkpoints can never be individually found to be unconstitutional.

The justices say that a checkpoint can become overly intrusive to the level of a constitutional violation if conducted without proper safeguards to protect individual rights. Any constitutional level issue may involve complex legal principles. A person accused of a crime may speak with a criminal defense lawyer for assistance in defending against the charge.

Source: The Herald-Sun, “Highway Patrol plans DWI checkpoints near boating areas,” Keith Upchurch, May 13, 2013

Greenville DUI Attorney Blog | North Carolina Underage Drinking Lawyer | Pitt County First DUI Law Firm

In recent weeks, we have discussed measures that North Carolina lawmakers have been considering to toughen North Carolina’s laws prohibiting driving while impaired. Many of the changes are the result of issues that state lawmakers have raised. The concept of applying the use of ignition interlock devices is an issue that has been raised in many areas of the country, and is being urged by federal highway officials.

About 30 years ago, federal highway officials began urging states to reduce the per se legal limit to drive under state DWI laws from 0.10 percent to 0.08 percent blood alcohol level. States began to follow that recommendation, and by 2004, all 50 states had lowered the legal limit.

Congress does not control state DWI laws, but the federal lawmakers do have authority over federal spending and can use that authority in funding issues to help coerce states to change their laws.

Now, the National Transportation Safety Board is starting a new surge to lower the legal limit to drive. The board made a recommendation Tuesday, urging states to lower the legal limit to 0.05 percent BAC.

The recommendation has brought opposition from a number of groups who say that the recommendation is just too low. The idea would potentially make it a crime to have even one drink before driving for some people. Alcohol behaves differently in different people.

Blood alcohol concentration levels can vary widely between people of different genders and different sizes. For instance, a 130 pound woman may be able to have three drinks over a 90-minute period and still be legal to drive under the current level. Dropping the level ton 0.05 would generally drop that to two drinks.

However, a “drink” itself can vary between the type of product, the pour of the bartender and other factors. A petite woman may not be able to legally drive home after one drink with friends after work if the level were dropped to 0.05.

The recommendation is coming from the NTSB, and has no force of law in any state. Lower legal limits already exist for some drivers, such as drivers under the age of 21, and others whose driver’s license sets a different level.

Source: New York Times, “States Urged to Cut Limit on Alcohol for Drivers,” Matthew Wald, May 14, 2013

Greenville DUI Attorney Blog | North Carolina Underage Drinking Lawyer | Pitt County First DUI Law Firm

Elijah Harper has died. More to come.
Manitoba stories

A care home CEO accused of violating provincial legislation in a retire-rehire scenario that gave him a raise during a salary freeze now faces new allegations.
Manitoba stories